Skip to main content

Comparative Criminal Judgments Project

THIS PROJECT IS NOW COMPLETED.

A Chinese translation of the judgments will appear in book form in due course, arranged by Liling Yue.

______________

Project Lead 

Professor Michael Bohlander 

Project Description 

This practice-facing, decolonisation-minded and best-practice sharing project will create a valuable resource of criminal judgments, drafted by experts on criminal law and procedure from a number of jurisdictions. A comprehensive factual case scenario will form the basis of the judgments, which will be based on the law and practice of each jurisdiction, written in English, but in the style of the relevant court in each jurisdiction.  

The project provides a hands-on approach to legal issues, demonstrating different drafting styles across jurisdictions and providing a valuable reference for practical understanding of different judicial cultures. It contributes to contemporary efforts to give a voice to jurisdictions which are not commonly heard on the global scene and could also be used in judicial training. 

The Scenario

You can read the scenario here.

Project Participants and Jurisdictions

  • Argentina: Daniela Part, María Eugenia Sagasta, Glenda de la Cruz, Octavia Botalla, Gonzalo Guerrero and Javier Augusto De Luca
  • Brazil: Paulo de Oliveira Segundo  
  • Bulgaria: Tatiana Batchvarova 
  • Cambodia: Bora Meas 
  • Chile: Carlos del Río Ferretti
  • China: Liling Yue  
  • England & Wales: HHJ Penelope Moreland and Natalie Wortley 
  • France: Aude Brejon
  • Germany: Michael Bohlander 
  • Iran: Mohammad M. Hedayati-Kakhki 
  • Italy: Antonio Balsamo; Giovanni Chiarini 
  • Netherlands: Laura Peters and Jacco Janssen 
  • Poland: Jarek Zagrodnik 
  • Uruguay: Pablo Galain and Ana Maria Guzman
  • Vietnam: Dang Minh Chau and Chau Thanh Nam

 

The Judgments

Argentina I

Argentina II

Brazil (I)

Brazil (II)

Bulgaria

Cambodia

Chile

China

England & Wales Jury Directions

England & Wales Sentencing Remarks

France: Motivation SheetFrance: Motivation Sheet

France: The Paris Assize Court Decision

France: Question SheetFrance: Question Sheet

Germany

Iran

Italy

Netherlands Judgment 1: John D

Netherlands Judgment 2: Mary J

Netherlands Judgment 3: Jack D

Netherlands Explanatory Note

Poland (I)

Poland (II)

Poland (III)

Uruguay Judgment: Adolescent

Uruguay Judgment: Adult

Vietnam